Deciding what to paint is so difficult for me. Not to toot my own horn, but I do feel capable of making any style of painting, from realism to abstract(I'm not saying I'm as good as Chuck Close or Picasso, just saying that I am capable to exploring both sides of the spectrum). Because of this, I struggle to find a balance. I love the attention to paint instead of content that abstract paintings deal with, but I love seeing the labor in realism. My question is how do I combine both? How do I take something like definitive imagery and use it in a way that you can't acknowledge what it is? How do you make something valuable with mastery look loose, naive, and valueless? Am I interested in painting more than I am in people? I enjoy painting people, but they carry with them a unique identity and by painting them I single out everybody else therefore creating less interesting art. Maybe creating long horizontal paintings featuring masses, some detailed, some not, unfinished like their lives, raw and uncontrollable like life itself.
Whoa, I just had an epiphany. Thanks for listening.
I can't really explain what just clicked in my mind, but I can show you old work I have done what has finally made things make sense.




